Parker Snider: Here in Alabama, the government can legally take your stuff (and not give it back)

19
20
Civil asset forfeiture

Along Highway 31 in Conecuh County, Alabama, lies a small town called Castleberry. Although the city boasts a population of less than 600 and a single caution light, it has its own police department. To fund itself, the Castleberry Police Department takes advantage of speeding passers-by and writes them tickets.

Nothing to see here.

In the words of President Trump, “Wrong.”

According to reports, after pulling a driver over, law enforcement takes whatever money and other possessions they want, justifying their seizure by claiming suspicion that the money and possessions are the profits of a drug crime. They also often tow the car, only to make drivers pay a $500 impound fee to get it back. Passers-by can then continue along their way—feeling robbed, confused, and reasonably angry.

This is illegal, right? Wrong again.

Although some of the specifics are being tried in court, the Castleberry Police Department is taking advantage of a fully legal practice known as civil asset forfeiture, a maneuver that allows law enforcement officers to legally seize your assets based on suspicion alone.

Originally intended to cut off the cash flow of drug cartels, civil asset forfeiture is a practice that is independent of personal guilt or innocence. Instead, the police charge or suspect your assets—money, cars, homes, and any other possessions—of being involved in a crime, and seize them.

This is clearly problematic. Along with the strange notion that inanimate objects can be charged for violating the law, this practice flies in the face of the fifth amendment due process clause of the United States Constitution that prevents the government from taking “life, liberty, or property, without due process of law”.

Civil asset forfeiture also hinges on flipping the innocent until proven guilty mantra of the American judicial system, as defendants must prove their innocence to get assets back, a reversal that we must reject. In the case that defendants are defiant and decide to hire an attorney to regain their belongings, the legal costs can rival the worth of the seized assets, making such attempts both expensive and, at times, pointless.

There’s more. According to current Alabama law and the Institute for Justice, police departments get to keep 100% of the proceeds from seized assets. The more seized, the more money the departments make.

With this allowance, law enforcement holds both sword and purse. Such a financial incentive makes abuse and targeting of innocent hard-working people, instead of real criminals, more likely.

Over 80% of Americans do not approve of civil asset forfeiture, according to a Cato Institute poll. Due to widespread support for change, the Alabama legislature is considering reform. Current proposed legislation protects innocent property owners and ensures that there is no opportunity to impute illegitimacy on our police.

We must call on the Alabama legislature to vote for reforms that eliminate from Alabama law this unconstitutional potential for abuse that, too often, becomes realized.

•••

Parker Snider is Manager of Policy Relations for the Alabama Policy Institute (API). API is an independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit research and educational organization dedicated to strengthening free enterprise, defending limited government, and championing strong families. If you would like to speak with the author, please e-mail communications@alabamapolicy.org or call (205) 870-9900.

19 COMMENTS

  1. magnificent publish, very informative. I’m wondering why the other experts of this sector do not notice this.
    You should continue your writing. I’m sure, you’ve a huge readers’ base already!

  2. First of all I want to say terrific blog! I had a
    quick question in which I’d like to ask if you don’t mind.
    I was curious to find out how you center yourself and clear your head prior to writing.
    I’ve had difficulty clearing my mind in getting my thoughts out there.
    I do enjoy writing however it just seems like the first 10 to 15
    minutes are lost simply just trying to figure out how to begin. Any recommendations
    or tips? Kudos!

  3. Oh my goodness! Incredible article dude!
    Thank you so much, However I am going through difficulties with your RSS.
    I don’t understand the reason why I cannot join it.
    Is there anybody else getting the same RSS issues?

    Anyone that knows the answer can you kindly respond? Thanx!!

  4. I don’t know if it’s just me or if everybody else experiencing problems with your website.
    It appears as if some of the text within your posts are running off the screen. Can someone else please provide feedback and let me
    know if this is happening to them as well? This might be a issue with my web browser because I’ve had this happen previously.
    Kudos

  5. After looking over a few of the articles on your site, I seriously appreciate your technique of blogging.
    I saved as a favorite it to my bookmark webpage list and will be checking back soon. Please visit my web site too and tell me what you think.

  6. I was excited to discover this web site. I need to to thank you for ones time
    due to this wonderful read!! I definitely really liked every part
    of it and I have you bookmarked to look at new information on your blog.

  7. This is a great tip particularly to those new to the blogosphere.
    Simple but very precise info… Many thanks for
    sharing this one. A must read post!

  8. Simply wish to say your article is as amazing.

    The clearness in your post is simply nice and that i could assume you’re a professional on this subject.
    Fine with your permission let me to take hold of your feed
    to stay up to date with forthcoming post. Thanks a
    million and please carry on the rewarding work.

  9. Excellent way of describing, and pleasant paragraph to obtain information concerning my
    presentation subject matter, which i am
    going to deliver in college.

Comments are closed.