Obscure issue aims for traction in presidential contest

If you thought estoppel was hard to get people interested in, try the Renewable Fuel Standard. Generally, it’s a 10-year-old mandate by Congress aimed at getting more ethanol, an alternative fuel made from corn, into gasoline to reduce emissions for cleaner air. Smarter Fuel Future, a group that opposes the standard, had a table at this weekend’s Sunshine Summit in Orlando, trying to gain attention to the issue. The group says it’s an “unfortunate case of good intentions gone bad” that “strains environmental resources and is a raw deal for consumers.” It even had a character informally named “Corn Guy” wearing an ear-of-corn costume and holding a sign that said, “Food Not Fuel.” Most gasoline sold in the United States is now 10 percent ethanol, or ethyl alcohol — the same type of alcohol in booze. America’s corn farmers, obviously, support the mandate. But critics complain it raises the cost of gas and say ethanol can damage engines, particularly in boats and motorcycles. According to the group’s handout, nine Republican presidential candidates oppose the standard and five support it — though statements from the candidates weren’t always clear about their actual position. That may be because it’s on a lower tier of concerns from, for example, jobs, immigration and health care; no candidate had brought up the fuel standard in remarks by mid-Friday afternoon. But Wayne Allard, vice president of the American Motorcyclist Association, said it’s a concern the next president will likely have to address. “This is a key issue to all (fuel) consumers on the road,” said Allard, a Republican and former U.S. senator for Colorado. “We want our candidates to be aware of it.”
Mo Brooks, Bradley Byrne, Gary Palmer among reps telling EPA: No more ethanol in our gas

Alabama congressional delegates Mo Brooks, Bradley Byrne, Gary Palmer and Robert Aderholt are among 184 conservative-leaning members of Congress urging the Environmental Protection Agency to abandon a new Renewable Fuel Standard plan. The proposal calls for increased levels of biofuel blending in the nation’s gasoline supply, a controversial policy embraced by few Republicans. The House members signed a letter Thursday addressed to Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Gina McCarthy calling on her to use the agency’s statutory authority to waive a provision passed by Congress in 2007 set to expand biofuel blending levels next year, breaching the current “E10 blendwall” which governs current levels. “Multiple studies have shown detrimental economic harm may be caused by breaching the E10 blendwall,” wrote lawmakers, citing a Congressional Budget Office report that predicted the change could raise the price of fuel by 26 cents per gallon. They also cited a paper by the think tank Charles Rivers Associates, which said the blendwall increase would lead to “limited availability, higher consumer costs, and fewer sales of conventional transportation fuels.” The group called the EPA’s current plans to implement the biofuel changes “impractical,” as it would take “decades, not months to build out the compatible vehicle fleet” and infrastructure necessary to accommodate the new, higher-ethanol gasoline required by the proposal.
